¿Hay alguien en línea? : Validez y fiabilidad de la versión en español de la Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) en universitarios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v18i2.394Palabras clave:
adicción, fiabilidad, análisis factorial, equivalencia de medidaResumen
Resumen
El impacto de las redes sociales en la vida cotidiana se ha convertido complejo en el establecimiento de límites entre el uso normal y patológico que podría conllevar a un trastorno adictivo. El objetivo del presente estudio fue brindar evidencias de validez y fiabilidad de las puntuaciones de la escala BFAS en población de estudiantes universitarios. La evaluación de las evidencias de validez y fiabilidad se realizó en una muestra de 510 jóvenes universitarios. La edad promedio de los participantes fue de 20.74 años (DEedad=2.57) el 54,1% fueron mujeres, se presentaron ligeras diferencias a nivel de grupo (sexo) pero no a nivel de significancia práctica d=.18. Para medir la adicción al Facebook se utilizó la Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) y el cuestionario Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) como medida de contraste (r=.60) que representa el 36% de influencia de una variable sobre la otra. La estructura interna fue determinada bajo el análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) que replico la unidimensionalidad (CFI=.994, RMSEA=.061). Además fue evaluada la equivalencia de medición mediante modelos de análisis factorial multigrupo (AFC-MG) donde se comprobó diferentes niveles de invarianza según sexo, edad y afectación académica. Fue corroborado el uso pertinente del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach mediante la implementación de restricciones en modelos confirmatorios para evaluar tau-equivalencia y medidas paralelas, donde obtuvo resultados adecuados de α=.84. Esta versión en español del BFAS brinda evidencias de validez y fiabilidad, que son útiles para la investigación debida su necesidad de inclusión en baterías que evalúen adicciones a redes sociales.
Palabras clave: adicción, equivalencia de medición, facebook, fiabilidad, análisis factorial
Abstract
The impact of social networks on daily life has become complex in establishing limits between normal and pathological use that could lead to an addictive disorder. The objective of this study was to provide evidence of validity and reliability of the BFAS scale in the population of university students. The evaluation of the evidences of validity and reliability was carried out in a sample of 510 university students. The average age of the participants was 20.74 years (DE age = 2.57), 54.1% were women, there were slight differences at the group level (sex) but not at the practical significance level d = .18. To measure Facebook addiction, the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) and the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) questionnaire were used as a measure of contrast (r = .60), the level of influence of one variable over the other found was of 36% The internal structure was determined under the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) that replicated the one-dimensionality (CFI = .994, RMSEA = .061). In addition, the equivalence of measurement was evaluated using multigroup factor analysis models (CFA-MG) where different levels of invariance were found according to sex. The relevant use of the Cronbach alpha coefficient was corroborated by the implementation of restrictions in confirmatory models to evaluate tau-equivalence and parallel measures, where it obtained an optimal results of α = .84. This version on spanish of the BFAS provides evidence of validity and reliability, which are useful for research due to its need to be included in batteries that assess addictions to social networks.
Key words: addiction, equivalence measurement, Facebook, reliability, factor analysis
Descargas
Citas
Referencias
Abel, J. P., Buff, C. L. y Burr, S. A. (2016). Social media and the fear of missing out: Scale development and assessment. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 14(1), 33-43.
Ahmet, A. K. I. N., Demirci, İ. y Serap, K. A. R. A. (2017). Facebook bağimliliği ölçeği nin türkçe formunun geçerliği ve güvenirliği. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (59), 65-72
Alt, D. (2015). College students’ academic motivation, media engagement and fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.057
Andreassen, C. S. (2015). Online social network site addiction: A comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports, 2(2), 175-184. doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0056-9
Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S. y Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 501-517. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517
Becker, J. B., McClellan, M. L. y Reed, B. G. (2017). Sex differences, gender and addiction. Journal of neuroscience research, 95(1-2), 136-147. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23963
Becoña, E., y Cortés, M. (2016). Manual de adicciones para psicólogos especialistas en psicología clínica en formación. Barcelona: Sociodrogalcohol
Beiler-May, A., Williamson, R. L., Clark, M. A. y Carter, N. T. (2017). Gender bias in the measurement of workaholism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(1), 104-110. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1198795
Bland, J. M. y Altman, D. G. (1997). Cronbach's alpha. BMJ: British Medical
Journal, 314(7080), 572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
Brailovskaia, J. y Margraf, J. (2017). Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students - A longitudinal approach. Plos One, 12(12), 1-15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189719.g001
Casale, S. y Fioravanti, G. (2018). Why narcissists are at risk for developing Facebook addiction: The need to be admired and the need to belong. Addictive behaviors, 76, 312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.038
Chan, T. K., Cheung, C. M., Shi, N. y Lee, M. K. (2015). Gender differences in satisfaction with Facebook users. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(1), 182-206. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-08-2014-0234
Cheung, G. W. y Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Chow, S. L., Leung, G. M., Ng, C. y Yu, E. (2009). A screen for identifying maladaptive internet use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(2), 324-332. doi: 10.1007/s11469-008-9170-4
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
Dhaha, I. S. Y. (2013). Predictors of Facebook addiction among youth: A Structural Equation Modeling (Sem). Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 2(4), 186-195.
Dias, P., Cadime, I., del Castillo-López, A., García-Castillo, F. y García del Castillo, J. (2018). Excessive facebook use among portuguese university students: contributes of the adaptation of the Bergen facebook addiction. Salud y Drogas, 18(1), 131-139. doi: 10.21134/haaj.v18i1.377
Drouin, M., O’Connor, K. W., Schmidt, G. B. y Miller, D. A. (2015). Facebook fired: Legal perspectives and young adults’ opinions on the use of social media in hiring and firing decisions. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.011
El Sahili, L. (2015). Psicología de facebook: Vislumbrando los fenómenos psíquicos, complejidad y alcance de la red social más grande del mundo. México: Trillas.
Feldt, L. S. y Brennan, R. L. (1989). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105–146). New York, NY: American Council on Education and Macmillan.
Fornell, C. y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluang structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Markeng Research, 18, 39- 50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
Garcia del Castillo, J. (2013). Technological addictions: the rise of social networks. Salud y Drogas, 13(1), 5-14. doi: 10.21134/haaj.v13i1.188
Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(6), 930-944. doi: 10.1177/0013164406288165
Holgado–Tello, F. P., Chacón–Moscoso, S., Barbero–García, I. y Vila–Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlaons in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quanty, 44(1), 153-166. doi: 10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
Hormes, J. M., Kearns, B. y Timko, C. A. (2014). Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits. Addiction, 109(12), 2079-2088. doi: 10.1111/add.12713
Hu, L. T. y Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
Kelley, K. y Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological methods, 17(2), 137-152. doi:10.1037/a0028086
Lee, S.-Y., Poon, W.-Y. y Bentler, P. M. (1995). A two-stage esmaon of structural equaon models with connuous and polytomous variables. Brish Journal of Mathemical and Stascal Psychology, 48(2), 339–358. doi: 10.1007/BF02294660
Mayo, A. M. (2015). Psychometric instrumentation: reliability and validity of instruments used for clinical practice, evidence-based practice projects and research studies. Clinical nurse specialist, 29(3), 134 138. doi:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000131
Meier, A., Reinecke, L. y Meltzer, C. E. (2016). “Facebocrastination”? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students’ well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.011
Moreau, A., Laconi, S., Delfour, M. y Chabrol, H. (2015). Psychopathological profiles of adolescent and young adult problematic Facebook users. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.045Phanasathit, M., Manwong, M., Hanprathet, N., Khumsri, J., & Yingyeun, R. (2015). Validation of the Thai version of Bergen Facebook addiction scale (Thai-BFAS). J Med Assoc Thai, 98(2), S108-S117.
Muniz, J., Elosua, P. y Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Ortuño-Sierra, J., Aritio-Solana, R., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2018). Mental health difficulties in children and adolescents: The study of the SDQ in the Spanish National Health Survey 2011–2012. Psychiatry research, 259, 236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.025
Pontes, H. M., Andreassen, C. S. y Griffiths, M.D. (2016). Portuguese Validation of the Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale: an Empirical Study. Int J Ment Health Addiction, 14, 1062–1073. doi: 10.1007/s11469-016-9694-y
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R. y Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Putnick, D. L. y Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
Roberts, J. A. y David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Romano, J. L., Kromrey, J. D., Owens, C. M. y Scott, H. M. (2011). Confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha on the basis of discrete, ordinal response items: Which one, if any, is the best? The Journal of Experimental Education , 7 9 (4) , 382 - 403. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2010.510859
Satici, S. A. y Uysal, R. (2015). Well-being and problematic Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 185-190. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.005
Salem, A.A., Almenaye, N.S. y Andreassen, C.S. (2016). A Psychometric Evaluation of Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) of University Students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(5), 199-205. doi: 10.5923/j.ijpbs.20160605.01
Silva, H., Areco, K.C., Bandiera-Paiva, P., Galvão, P.V., Garcia, A.N. y Silveira, D.X. (2015). Equivalência semântica e confiabilidade da versão em português da Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 64(1), 17-23. doi: 10.1590/0047-2085000000052
Vandenberg, R. J. y Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
Wang, C. W., Ho, R. T., Chan, C. L. y Tse, S. (2015). Exploring personality characteristics of Chinese adolescents with internet-related addictive behaviors: Trait differences for gaming addiction and social networking addiction. Addictive behaviors, 42, 32-35. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.039
Widaman, K. F. y Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281-324). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10222-009
Yildirim, C. y Correia, A. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Young, N. L., Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Howard, C. J. (2017). Passive Facebook use, Facebook addiction, and associations with escapism: An experimental vignette study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.039
Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 4. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con la declaración de principios éticos disponible en la web y con los siguientes términos:
Los derechos del material publicado pertenecerán a sus respectivos autores. Los artículos publicados en HAAJ se pueden utilizar bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International, por lo que se permite la lectura, copia, distribución, impresión, búsqueda o realizar enlaces al texto completo de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo del editor o del autor, siempre que se referencia a HAAJ y a los autores y no se utilice con fines comerciales.
Los autores pueden incluir la obra en repositorios institucionales o en otras publicaciones siempre que se reconozca y cite adecuadamente esta revista.
El equipo editorial de HAAJ anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos publicados a través de cualquier medio (conferencias, clases, charlas, etc.) y/o plataformas (redes sociales, repositorios, webs, etc.).
HAAJ sigue las "Core Practices" de COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).